KATOWICE, a puzzle of interests and conditions.

Do the needful to get it is the lemma to tackle GW

In Poland, climate talks will not come to a desired end, therefore, more time is deemed necessary to finalise the PCD’s rulebook as forecasted in Paris in 2015.

KATOWICE OUTCOME: Deceptive as the previous summit results (Bonn November 2017) I really wonder whether or not large organizations are effectively contributing to their nationals plans to implement PCA by the end of this year in Poland Summit. It is the last year to do it. To accomplish such an obligation, organisations should first re-orient their corporate/business area strategy whichever their business object be the one. The Green economy is the main aim in the years to come. On its implementation lay down the last opportunities to decarbonize electricity supply at planetarium scale. Shall Green Economy receive the green light to kick-start the deep transformation some of the old dated market economy practices so urgently need? KATOWICE summit reflects the complex puzzle of interest and a huge amount of money that are the major obstacles.  Read about in the UNEP official document: https://lnkd.in/dJryBSw

In this kind of planetary meeting, the 200 participant countries exhibit their significant differences in terms of development and richness. There are developed countries (G8 members), then the least developed countries and at the end, the developing ones, a large majority.

At the same time, all these nations split between mainly liable of CC/GW (larger emitters of CO2 emission, as G20s) living together with medium and small emitters; and the worst of all, there are victim nations with several degree of effects. At the end of the chain, there are fully innocent countries which, just receive the nocive effects from someone else’s emission. Like the Kiribati archipelago in the Pacific ocean equator, (a country which will soon become covered by the rise of marine water level.)

Furthermore, there are countries that still keep down large deposits of fossil fuels onto their subsoils, as RKS, USA, Germany, Poland,

Australia, Russia, etc, which should be shut down in short time. On the other hand, have those countries with almost no fuels but large conditions to generate most of the electricity they need from eolic ranches and solar farms as Chile, Spain and Portugal, for instance.

 In reference to the Biosphere protection, countries sensibility it varies between two poles: USA on the right, whose president refuses the anthropogenic cause of GW/CC. And Ireland and Norway on the left, whose government has targeted year 2050 to become a low-carbon society while Ireland would transform into a ‘decarbonized economy’ (the first Green one, in other words) bearing on mind Norway currently exploit vast reserves of oil located down the North Sea.

Sea drill oil platform in the North Sea of Norway

Right in the middle, we find the giant Chinese economy which produces the biggest volume of CO2 all over along with vast reserves of coal. Noteworthy, China is heavily investing and spending on renewables, nuclear and hydropower sources of energy, much more than any other country in the world.

On these hands lay down the last opportunities to decarbonize electricity supply at planetarium scale. Shall Green Economy receive the green light to kick-start the deep transformation some of the old dated market economy practices so urgently need?

A large puzzle of interest and a huge amount of money are the major obstacles.

https://ecojobssiglo21.blogspot.com/2018/07/to-decarbonize-energy-supply-at.html